Discover how we can impact your business. email us at enableme@artifact3.com

enableme@artifact3.com or call us at 781.290.9233

Posts Tagged ‘elearning’

07.23.2009

The Benefits of e-Learning are…

•    Increased productivity of employees
•    Measurable ROI
•    Increased speed to competency
•    Decreased travel expenses
•    Insurable consistency of delivered material
•    Ability to communicate subject matter expertise to a broader audience
•    Obtainable usage metrics
•    Infinite life-cycle of course-ware
•    Reduction in printed material costs

06.19.2009

Learning Activity Semantics

What type of learning activity will you employ to enable your partners, sales teams and customers? Will it be some sort of E-Learning course? Maybe it will employ the tenets of distance learning. Better yet, it should be delivered via virtual classroom.

At the end of the day, it’s semantics.  There are two ways to look at learning. The first is learning that’s designed to enhance job and organizational performance. The second is learning that’s designed to satisfy a check box that communicates, “Yes, I took this training course”.  The latter of the two is not where you want to be, for a number of reasons.

One, check box training possesses a low ROI. Second, the most valuable training materials, regardless of delivery mode have second, third and fourth lives. They become points of reference and are shared, tagged and enhanced in lockstep with the evolution of the idea or product they support.

Learning materials that fall into the second category are typically the most compelling because there’s a 1:1 correlation between the information they communicate and the audience’s job related responsibilities. Additionally, they break the rules of traditional education delivery. Rather than forcing the audience to consume the information linearly, they work with how the audience thinks or needs the information.

The delivery modes are blended and use both digital and print liberally. These courses behave more like conversations between an SME and an interested disciple, opposed to a freshman chained to a desk in a 1500 person lecture hall.

Which experience sounds most appealing to you?

If you said the first, I implore you to never return to this blog. If you’re compelled by the second, stick around; we’re just getting started.

05.26.2009

Traits of a ‘Course’

The term “e-learning” isn’t without baggage. When organizations, moreover people hear the term, the mind almost immediately moves to:

Education
Mandatory Coursework
Certification

These are but terms that distill the conversation even further but let’s move out of the weeds. E-learning is about imparting information to an audience, plain and simple. Regardless of the standards or delivery mechanisms the course must exhibit the following traits,

Reach the Audience
Accessibility
Impact-fulness
Verifiable

Reaching The Audience ::

A well designed course is crafted in such a way that entices the audience to come back for more. In a sense, it becomes a trusted portal to related ‘hard’ materials and soft points of interest. Succinctly, it’s a game of connecting the dots. The course designer’s role is to present the dots in an intriguing fashion while it’s the audience’s responsibility to connect them.

Accessible ::

Anytime, anywhere, online and offline access to content is not a luxury. The usage, impact, and pervasiveness of mobile devices to consume information will only increase and that’s how audiences eat information. Providing them with the flexibility to consume information on their own terms is a critical component of inviting the audience into the conversation (even if it’s a monologue).

Impact-fulness ::

Engaging with a mobile, multi-tasking audience is challenging. In short this a core reason why e-learning is deeper than an enhanced PowerPoint. Aligning the organization’s learning objectives with the needs of the audience adds a personal context the audience can relate to. It’s this relevance that contributes directly to an artifact’s relevance.

Verifiable ::

Did the course meet its objectives?

Usage metrics are great, however that information needs to be distilled into its essential components.

Who consumed the artifact?
Was the correct audience identified?
Did the audience share the artifact with other parties?
On what chapters, parts or sections did they spend the most and least time?

This information plays a critical role in building subsequent sustainable ‘artifacts’. These artifacts being supportive elearning course-work, dynamic whitepapers, manuals or marketing documentation.

Building an artifact without these tenets will provide little more than a shell of an idea. The objective is to create a 3-dimensional piece that engages the audience on mulitple levels, allowing them to consume the idea from perspectives they have yet to consider.

04.23.2009

Your Communications Are Myopic

With your nose pressed to the glass it’s easy to lose perspective. The glass in this case being the product or organization you’re marketing or the idea that you’re evangelizing. In my experience, creators, such as Product Managers and Product Marketing Managers, are notorious for exhibiting this myopic view. While communicators, such as Product Evangelists are not. The primary reason is proximity. The proximity of the orator to the audience. Traditionally, PMs and PMMs are insulated from the word on street and rely heavily on analysis reports, CxO round table events and internal subject matter experts to form the appropriate marketing collateral. Evangelists on the other hand speak face-to-face with users of the product from multiple perspectives. Some of these (perspectives) include that of channel partners, technical sales persons, sales persons, end users, etc.

It’s this type of first person communication that makes their perspective so valuable.

  • Valuable to collateral creation
  • Valuable to ongoing and new product development
  • Valuable to channel development

In short these are the true communication gymnasts of your organization.

The problem with this scenario is a lack of scalability. It’s simply difficult to communicate in an evangelistic, first person style, consistently and cost effectively. Sure, there are technologies, such as web conferencing tools that can mitigate the issue slightly but these solutions are only addressing the symptoms and not the problem.

In order to truly address the issue, a hard look needs be taken at;

  • What types of collateral are being produced?
  • How is your collateral being used and where does it fail?
  • Who is the actual audience verses the intended audience?
  • What is the best way to reach the defined audience?
  • How are they expecting to be communicated with?
  • How are you to maintain a close, customized, first person conversation with this audience?

These questions cannot be answered by increasing the marketing budget to allocate more resources. This economy won’t allow you to do that. Rather, the way you become the rockstar is by figuring out a way to market conversationally through conventional and possibly unconventional channels. All the while leveraging the majority of collateral that has already been created for marketing and communication purposes.

This is precisely the point where marketing and e-learning align. The prevailing point being, your audience doesn’t trust you. They are leery of your high level fancy communications. They distrust your ROI calculators, not because they are wrong but because you created them. What they want is to be able to kick the tires of your solution. They want to see what’s under the covers. Most importantly they want to see how your product fixes their problem. They certainly don’t care to see how it addresses 38 other issues they don’t have.

Case studies are one way of accomplishing this goal. White-papers are another. Podcasts that are associated with white-papers and case studies are even better. The point is, in order to win, you must communicate in a fashion that your audience can hear you from multiple perspectives without having to think about how to consume the material. You must communicate like an evangelist. The only difference is, it’s critical you, moreover your organization be able to speak to the appropriate audience from within a context they can hear you through.