<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Artifact3.com | Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artifact3.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artifact3.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:45:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Art of Failing by Jennifer Black</title>
		<link>http://www.artifact3.com/blog/2010/05/27/the-art-of-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artifact3.com/blog/?p=196#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>The cover story of Wired magazine from January 2010 addresses this same topic. It&#039;s called &quot;How to Fail: Why Losing Big Can be a Winning Strategy&quot; and covers everything from neuroscience to video games to Alex Baldwin. Check it out at http://www.wired.com/magazine/18-01.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cover story of Wired magazine from January 2010 addresses this same topic. It&#8217;s called &#8220;How to Fail: Why Losing Big Can be a Winning Strategy&#8221; and covers everything from neuroscience to video games to Alex Baldwin. Check it out at <a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/18-01" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/magazine/18-01</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Training Aligned with Database Marketing by Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.artifact3.com/blog/2010/04/05/training-aligned-with-database-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artifact3.com/blog/?p=184#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>Nice work, Amin.

This is a clear, cogent explanation of marketing optimization, and I think it&#039;s a good overarching articulation of what Artifact3 can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, Amin.</p>
<p>This is a clear, cogent explanation of marketing optimization, and I think it&#8217;s a good overarching articulation of what Artifact3 can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Training Aligned with Database Marketing by Thor Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.artifact3.com/blog/2010/04/05/training-aligned-with-database-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artifact3.com/blog/?p=184#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>Amin&#039;s got it right.  Keep your Big Themes in mind, but use the data you have on a prospect (or a trainee) when delivering ANY message to make that message more relevant, more effective.  

B2C marketers have known this for years.  Only now is the B2B side using quantitative approaches and methods.  Plus, I like the idea of adopting training programs as marketing assets for demand generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amin&#8217;s got it right.  Keep your Big Themes in mind, but use the data you have on a prospect (or a trainee) when delivering ANY message to make that message more relevant, more effective.  </p>
<p>B2C marketers have known this for years.  Only now is the B2B side using quantitative approaches and methods.  Plus, I like the idea of adopting training programs as marketing assets for demand generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Presentation Template Sucks by Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.artifact3.com/blog/2010/02/01/your-presentation-template-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artifact3.com/blog/?p=163#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>The title of your blog post sucks.

See what happened there? I have some, I think, useful, accurate, feedback for you, but en route to trying to catch your eye, I&#039;ve actually turned you off to hearing it.

You&#039;re correct that it&#039;s more likely true than not that my (and others&#039;) presentation template sucks. And this post includes some excellent, concrete feedback on how to rehab and improve it. 

But...as someone whose presentation template *does* suck, I instead feel a little embarassed and turned off by the title, regardless of the quality and utility of the fixes you mention. 

I think this actually speaks to two larger points about learning:

First, most adult learners do not want to be approached as receptacles for information, but rather as voluntary partners in the learning process. I think it&#039;s important to recognize and incorporate that into your training style, regardless of the knowledge differential between instructor and learner.

Second, what role does a blog play in the learning process? I think that many organizations--private, public, and non-profit sector--have been quick to jump on blogs as a platform without a clear understanding of where they fit in the larger learning arc. Is a blog a mechanism for shortening the distance between customer/client/funder/etc. and the organization? Or are you using it as another form of e-learning? I ask that, beacuse I&#039;ve seen too many blogs purposed as instructional tools that take a tone and strategy that I don&#039;t think the individual trainer or organization would necessarily use in a formal training session.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of your blog post sucks.</p>
<p>See what happened there? I have some, I think, useful, accurate, feedback for you, but en route to trying to catch your eye, I&#8217;ve actually turned you off to hearing it.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re correct that it&#8217;s more likely true than not that my (and others&#8217;) presentation template sucks. And this post includes some excellent, concrete feedback on how to rehab and improve it. </p>
<p>But&#8230;as someone whose presentation template *does* suck, I instead feel a little embarassed and turned off by the title, regardless of the quality and utility of the fixes you mention. </p>
<p>I think this actually speaks to two larger points about learning:</p>
<p>First, most adult learners do not want to be approached as receptacles for information, but rather as voluntary partners in the learning process. I think it&#8217;s important to recognize and incorporate that into your training style, regardless of the knowledge differential between instructor and learner.</p>
<p>Second, what role does a blog play in the learning process? I think that many organizations&#8211;private, public, and non-profit sector&#8211;have been quick to jump on blogs as a platform without a clear understanding of where they fit in the larger learning arc. Is a blog a mechanism for shortening the distance between customer/client/funder/etc. and the organization? Or are you using it as another form of e-learning? I ask that, beacuse I&#8217;ve seen too many blogs purposed as instructional tools that take a tone and strategy that I don&#8217;t think the individual trainer or organization would necessarily use in a formal training session.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
